NIKE ZOOM TERRA KIGER
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e1fb1/e1fb17151c122b54a2aa3238012066a1bd63adad" alt="Nike Zoom Terra Kiger Review"
Despite having issues with Nike kicks in the past, both the Nike Zoom Terra Kiger and Zoom Wildhorse blew my mind w/ awesome. This particular model shares a large number of similarities with the Wildhorse, but I would consider it the “race” version.
Things that I like include it’s light weight (~8oz), it’s flexibility, the burrito-style upper, the upper materials, the grip & outsole and it’s looks. All of these factors combine to make a pretty damn impressive shoe that blossoms when racing fast on buffed-out terrain.
The major issues with this shoe include my concerns with it’s durability (the lugs have worn quite a bit and there are already some seams splitting in the upper around the ankle) & it’s fit (designed to fit tight like a track spike). Other than that, this shoe is a badass delight.
Have you had any experience in the Terra Kiger? Let me know in the comments below.
LIKED:
- Light (8oz)
- Comfortable (like WILDHORSE)
- Upper (multilayer fabric flexible, fly wire & burrito)
- Zoom Air (heel & forefoot)
- Grip
DISLIKED:
- Upper structure (foot moves more, no heel counter)
- Wear & tear (outsole, upper)
- Flat toe box (like a track spike)
QUALITY: 4/5
COMFORT: 4/5
PRICE: 4/5
LOOKS: 4/5
TOTAL: 16/20
These shoes were provided by Nike for review. All opinions are my own.
NIKE ZOOM WILDHORSE
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/de21e/de21e5a37e242d39e9afe342dab42ebc832eb8b5" alt="Nike Zoom Wildhorse Review"
Despite having issues with Nike kicks in the past, both the Nike Zoom Terra Kiger and Zoom Wildhorse blew my mind w/ awesome. I found that the Wildhorse became my “work” horse and spent a bulk of my training miles in the past few months in this shoe. It really is surprising to me how much I enjoyed it.
While the shoe is heavier than the Terra Kiger (9+oz vs. 8oz respectively), I found that I didn’t necessarily notice the weight addition, and it felt like a much lighter shoe. Also, the upper has been awesome, the outsole grip surprising, the flexibility a delight, drainage a successs, and the overall running experience a joy.
One of the major issues I have with this shoe is the lack of a rockplate. Some people would disagree and say that the midsole provides enough protection, but after running the Gorge 50k, I found that the midsole just wasn’t enough for the longer runs. By adding a thin, light plate in the mid/forefoot, Nike could not only distinguish this shoe from the Terra Kiger, but make a stand-out performer for the technical trails and races out there. Also, the shoe seems to be wearing a bit prematurely on the outsole and outer most layer of the upper. While I have no doubt the shoe will continue to rock for hundreds of more miles, I wouldn’t expect too much wear after 100 miles of training/racing.
Have you had any experience in the Zoom Wildhorse? Let me know in the comments below.
LIKED:
-
Comfort (like KIGER philon cushlon midsole)
-
Looks
-
Grip
-
Upper (multilayer including structure elements)
-
Drainage
-
Light (9.5+oz)
DISLIKED:
-
No rock plate
-
Outsole wear
-
Upper durability
-
Sizing
-
Laces length
QUALITY: 4/5
COMFORT: 4/5
PRICE: 4/5
LOOKS: 5/5
TOTAL: 17/20
These shoes were provided by Nike for review. All opinions are my own.
Tags: beer, best, ethan newberry, ginger runner, gingerrunner, marathon, nike zoom terra kiger review, nike zoom wildhorse review, nike+, race, review, terra kiger, trail, train, ultra running, ultramarathon, wildhorse, worst, zoom